Mobile advertising. Remixed.

Posts Tagged ‘transparency’

We must liberate mobile metrics to make advertising measurable

Monday, December 28th, 2009

GoMo News today posted an article I wrote calling for the industry to be more open with mobile metrics.  Here it is again:

Mobile advertisers face a big problem: Fragmentation.  Not of technology, but of information.

Say you’re one of the majority of mobile advertisers wishing to drive traffic to their mobile internet site or mobile app by advertising on other mobile sites and apps.  How do you measure the effectiveness of your campaigns?  The agencies and ad networks alone can’t tell you. A high exposure rate is meaningless unless you get clicks, and yet a high click through rate is not always a good thing.  Your site analytics alone can’t tell you because you don’t know if those high conversion rates came at a prohibitive price.

So at a minimum you need to track spend on the ads and conversions on your site / app for each and every campaign you run.  And this is where fragmentation laughs in your face and turns your marketing team into copy-pasting slaves.  The problem is threefold:

-        duplication of reporting from ad networks and agencies

-        duplication of conversion tracking on your site/app

-        stitching it together

Firstly, you’ve got to aggregate ad performance data in a meaningful way from multiple ad networks and agencies.  Some of the more forward-thinking ones are realising this and planning an API to give their clients direct access to their data (I wrote about this recently: Ad networks: emancipate your clients data!).  But precious few of them are doing this and it will probably be years before they all do, by which time many will have been acquired or sidelined.  Meantime, you have to navigate your way through many different, sometimes complex, sometimes downright awful reporting interfaces to manually extract your data.

Secondly, for those ad networks that offer ‘conversion tracking’ features, you need to integrate their tracking code into your site or app in order to see full CPA performance data for each ad running on their network.  This sounds like a great idea, until you realise how many separate tracking codes you’re going to need to integrate to cover all the ad networks.  Once you’ve got more than a couple of these ‘trackers’ running, response times are going to suffer.  Don’t worry though, hardly any offer this yet anyway.  You could use an analytics provider to track conversions instead, but you’ll need separate tracker codes for your mobile sites (Admob, Bango and Omniture are the most well-known with Google only recently releasing a mobile analytics service) and for your apps (the recent merger of Flurry and Pinch Media is looking a good bet here but still does not cover all the device base).

These two issues compound the problem of how to stitch it all together.  Obviously there’s the sheer effort of just having to collect and capture common-denomination, comparable data from all these sources into one place and then match it all up.  Then there are time zone and currency differences.  Nearly all ad networks and some analytics providers think you live just up the road from them.  How are you supposed to compare ad spend in the US delivered by an ad network headquartered in India with conversion data from your analytics provider in the UK?

For me, there is one clear and relatively simple solution to this problem:  Ad networks and analytics providers give your clients their data in a time zone independent format and liberate it with an API. That way, they can easily combine and compare ad performance end to end for each and every one of their campaigns.  The advertisers and ad agencies will be the final deciders on this, and they will choose those companies in the ecosystem that are able to give them the data they need whenever and however they want it.

Ad networks: emancipate your clients data!

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

Admob confirms API on twitterEvery ad network should offer an API for advertisers to directly access to their ad performance data.

Contrary to what some of the ad networks state in their terms and conditions, the performance data really belongs to the advertiser, with the ad networks responsible for safeguarding and respecting the privacy of that data. Does AdMob (GoogMob?) own, and have the right to publish and share, the adspend and clickthrough data of Nike? Of course not. It just has the right to use it in aggregate to track and develop insights into industry trends and improve their service.

Advertisers want their data, and they don’t want to go through all those different reporting interfaces (some are ok, some are downright appalling) to get it. So it is great news to see AdMob, the innovation leader in this space, confirming in a public tweet that they are definitely working on such an API.

Almost every advertiser uses multiple ad networks to deliver their ad campaigns. And the ones that they will choose will recognise that the data belongs first and foremost to the advertiser and give them access to it however and whenever they want.

Clarity and control will drive growth of mobile advertising

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

There is currently an imbalance in supply and demand in the mobile advertising market. There is no shortage of mobile websites, portals and apps out there to advertise on, but there are not enough big spending advertisers to fill the inventory with high-value ads. The majority of publishers are the long tail, using blind ad networks (such as AdMob) to sell their inventory on a CPC basis. The kind of advertisers using these ad networks have to be comfortable with a loss of control over where and how their ads are displayed. Mobile content companies and small-time advertisers abound, with the ringtone and adult entertainment sector being notably well represented. Much of this advertising is taking limited or no advantage of the benefits the mobile channel offers such as location awareness or demographic / behavioural targeting.

There are big brands advertising on mobile, but in a different way and in small doses; they are often working with agencies and ad networks that can tell them which sites their ads will be displayed on and the user demographics of those sites because it’s important to control their brand image. They are also advertising on the iPhone where they can find more well-off consumers, despite in some cases losing control over which apps their ads will appear in.

For mobile advertising to really take off, the big brands and non-mobile companies need to spend more money on it, which will be driven by:

  • More control over the quality of their ad campaigns, driven largely by greater smartphone adoption and data speeds
  • Greater confidence in where and how their ads are displayed so they can control their brand image
  • More accurate measurement of ads, which depends on agencies and ad networks providing improved ad performance data in a way that can be aggregated and compared, and also on better analytics of what happens on the advertiser’s properties in order to give an accurate end to end picture of short and long term ad performance and ROI
  • Greater cross-channel integration of the conception, delivery and measurement of ad campaigns across multiple media in addition to mobile.

I think that the technical challenge of ad delivery to a fragmented mobile device base is largely on the way to being solved. The measurement of unique users and understanding who they in greater depth are has not … but this is an envisioned advantage of mobile over traditional media, and I do not see it as a brake for growth right now. And since most of the privacy issues are again associated with the new envisioned capabilities of mobile, they are in my opinion simply (though not straightforwardly) something that needs to be managed as the industry continues to innovate.

Image attributed to: http://www.flickr.com/photos/celinet/ / CC BY-SA 2.0

AdMob removes AdWhirl from the game, says ‘trust me’

Saturday, August 29th, 2009

In a previous post, I talked about how AdMob’s move to stop supporting ad mediation layers such as AdWhirl and TapJoy for ad serving was bad for competition in the mobile advertising market, and would push many iPhone developers into having to make a tough choice to stick with Admob or go elsewhere. Now AdMob has gone and acquired AdWhirl, thus changing the developer’s choice from ‘to AdMob or not to AdMob’ to ‘to trust AdMob or not to trust AdMob’.

Despite AdMob’s (sincere, I think) assurances of transparency and fairness, open sourced code and so on, it’s just human nature to be suspicious and look for conspiracy. How can AdMob assure everyone that they do not have a conflict of interest between becoming the biggest ad network in the world and offering a service that helps developers use other ad networks to monetise their apps instead? You can’t be an independent financial advisor if you’re incentivised to offer products from only one bank. How can AdMob be an independent mobile ad broker if it really wants you to use its own network?

AdMob knows that information is the new oil. That’s why they launched AdMob analytics, which already gives them plenty of information about their customers and also rival ad network performance, because advertisers can use it to track ad performance with other ad networks (although it can’t track pricing). But this is exactly the same reason why people will not trust their acquisition of AdWhirl.

What iPhone developers need now is a mediation layer mediation layer whereby the app can switch between mediation layers to serve the highest paying mediation layers’ ads ;-)

Alternatively, AdMob could ensure they offer such great eCPMs and revenue-share to developers via their own ad network that it becomes a no-brainer to use them, mediation layer or not.

BuzzCity campaign planner a step in the right direction for transparency

Monday, June 8th, 2009

Transparency is sorely lacking in the still immature mobile advertising ecosystem. Most mobile ad networks cannot even tell you the volume of impressions and clicks that they generate in a given country.  You have to rely on trial and error to discover what bang you’re gonna get for your buck. (As a sidenote, most ad networks price in US Dollars now so people can compare prices globally; shame they still think all advertisers live in the same timezone as they do too). And none of them can give you details about the segmentation of their network’s user base.

So it’s a breath of fresh air to see BuzzCity take some first steps in the right direction with the release of their Campaign Planner tool to help advertisers better understand the audience they are addressing and target their campaigns accordingly.  For any country you select, the campaign planner gives detailed information about the number of impressions per month, average campaign CPC, and a breakdown of traffic by mobile operator, device type and features, and even gender, age and more detailed location information where available.  However I suspect this information is based on the MyGamma social network which forms the core of the BuzzCity publisher network … but is not necessarily representative of total network traffic.buzz_campaign_planner_shot1

The next step is to let advertisers actually target their campaigns using the same criteria.  But this is difficult to do when many publishers on an ad network are unable to provide this information.  This will come with time.

In the meantime a simple but sorely needed step forward would be to actually calculate in advance the clicks that a campaign can be expected to generate in a given country for a given bid price.  All mobile ad networks have enough data to work this out.  Why not share it with advertisers so they can better understand the dynamics of the system?